भारत के श्रेष्ठ लोग और उन के बारे में भ्रांतियां

भारतीय पवित्र शांति चिन्ह स्वस्तिक को जबरदस्ती मजहबी पश्चिमी लोगों द्वारा हकेन्क्रयूज़ (hooked cross) से तुलना कर दी गयी | इस पर प्रस्तुत है एक डाक्यूमेंट्री

आर्य आक्रमण के झूठे मनगढ़ंत आरोपों की धज्जियाँ उड़ाते गंभीर प्रमाणिक अध्ययन पर उत्तम लोगों के विचार

#vedicAryavart #vedicArya #vedic #AryaSamaj #Aryaninvasion #AIT #AryanInvasionTheory #hawan #vedicpravachan #ved #Veda #AaryaKaunThe #AaryanRace #AaryaKahanSeAayeThe #AaryaKaunSiJatiHai #Noble #AryaNotRace #Arya #Shreshth #श्रेष्ठ ##आर्यावर्त #Aryavart #Aaryan #Sindhughati #AryaHistory #AaryaHistory #Saral #history #History #Itihas #hindi #sanskrit #कौनथेआर्य #आर्यआक्रमण #भारत #अंग्रेजोंकेषड़यंत्र #आर्यन #द्रविड़

#आर्यन #द्रविड़

'आर्य बनाम द्रविड़' एक मिथक है | डॉ. सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी जी
डॉ. सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी बताते हैं कि क्यों #आर्यन और #द्रविड़ सिद्धांतों को फूट डालो और राज करो के एक उपकरण के रूप में निर्मित और प्रचारित किया गया था।

There was no race named Aryan. All Migration theory is based on the racial mindset of Racist western communities. White Nordics are born to rule the world. Arya was just a degree given to noble people. Nobody instantly acquired it as they were born. When all the eligibilities were acquired by any normal Inhabitant of Aryavart, they were termed as Arya or a Noble civilian. That davidian concept made by British historyns, they're know when India United, that's making problems for them. We are same people hinduksh to kanyakumari

Untouchability was a social distortion and disorder, which we have abolished now. , Untouchability later enchased by Missionary Britishers and by Izlam. They still practice it in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Same CRT and Wokism again creating untouchability a term to divide Nation. Actually, "Bhangi" was a term coined to describe all those who had left their classical works under the Izlamic rule reign. Such heroes preferred to do a human-scavenger job than converting. Yes, it's true, that is why we find all gotras in all four-five divisions of the class hierarchy in India. If we do social reforms regularly which is very general in Hindu society, we may soon get rid of fake facts from colonial bias

The varna system of India is very different from the caste system which was misunderstood by the Europeans settlers whose inventions of extreme caste system was basically to suit political purposes attributing mischievously the caste to the varana which originally is not inherited, that said there was definite exploitation of lower class by higher class but not as systematically as is being attributed, the priestly class historacilly never had political power to exercise continues subgication of majority of people besides there's no religious sanction either. A proper understanding of religious texts throughs enough light that the shruti is considered supreme & not the manusmirithi which is wrongly attributed as the justification for caste system .

The caste exploitation rehotorics were conveniently used by the Europeans for political purposes by superimposing the oppressive features of class conflicts & slavery practiced in Europe....

The above hypothesis is supported by absence of records of oppression in history besides the brahimincal class never exercised actual political power ....

There's a definite need for genuine scientific studies on the social practice in pre colonial days without the European biases..... there's lots of discrption about the social life available in classical literature of both sanskrit & Tamil.

Every time when ever there were social aberrations there were always internal enlightened course corrections like from the emergence of buddhism to that of people like Narayanan guru & even to political leaders like Gandhi but what is brutal is the system of exploitation of caste as vote bank in the democratic republic post the British era

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

you have not studied AIT properly and the counter theory OIT. Language and color skin does't seem to show any correlation, begining in the bronze age people were intermixing. As for why you see diff in complexion between NI and SI is because, as you stated intermixing but due to climate as well. But this intermixing is not just from Eurasia but from the East as well. India had ties with South Eastern countries. Clear proof look at temple curvings of India many of them look Asiatic like even today a lot Indians share their ancestry with East Asians. The same goes for Eurasia and Eastern Europe. Many Malayalis have Roman ancestry. Your entire argument is based this difference which I am saying is true but does not prove AIT. Look at the paintings of Egyptians they look dark and they spoke a Semetic langauage, today they look light skin and still speak a semetic language. Same goes for many North Africans and Arabs. R1a and Steppe are not the same thing. As for the divison of North Indians and South Indians, these are artifically created by European scholars by using linqustics. In reality Southern India is South of the Vindyas. Its a geographical division. There were no two divisions of India in any of our traditional texts besides the divions of Brahmins in the 12th century. So go and study Indian history properly before making any videos. You're a Dravidianist, you're not neautral in your analysis.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

have a few small nitpicks. First of all David Reich is a supporter of the steppe migration theory.

Secondly he is not looking at the Y-chomosome, so his conclusions are not based on the R1a-marker. Instead he uses a method called shotgun sampling so sample small parts of the entire genome. In fact the Rakhihargi genome could never have R1a, because women don't have Y-chromosomes.

The Rakhhargi woman lived before the steppe migration, so we should not expect her genome to have any steppe DNA. (After all she could not be a descendant of people that had not arrived yet). So her DNA shows exactly what we should expect from the steppe migration theory.

The merchants of Turan also lived before the steppe migration, their DNA also show what we should expect from the steppe migration theory.

Note that North and South Indians probably already looked different before the steppe migration, because the ancient South Indians have more Andaman related hunter gatherer DNA. So it is dangerous to use skin color to prove the Steppe migration theory.

Finally the mathematical models suggest that intermarriage between subcastes (Jati) stopped around 0 BCE. And that is 1500 years after the steppe migration. So the caste system of vedic times was much different from the caste system of today. (I don't think that we have proof that the Harappans did not have a caste system, but that is an other discussion)

We don't know if the Harappans spoke a Dravidian language. They could easily have spoken a language that is forgotten now.

I think that Dr Shinde makes a good point that the North Indians only have 30% steppe DNA, and at this point there are no pure steppe migrants left in India. Everybody is mixed race, and everybody has ancestors that are steppe migrants, neolithic farmers and hunter gatherers.

You should have a look at Vargheesh Narasimhans article (supervised by David Reich). The first part is very readable.

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/vagheesh/files/eaat7487.full_.pdf

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am no idea why you posted a link to your video, but I can tell by watching it you have not studied AIT properly and the counter theory OIT. Language and color skin does't seem to show any correlation, begining in the bronze age people were intermixing. As for why you see diff in complexion between NI and SI is because, as you stated intermixing but due to climate as well. But this intermixing is not just from Eurasia but from the East as well. India had ties with South Eastern countries. Clear proof look at temple curvings of India many of them look Asiatic like even today a lot Indians share their ancestry with East Asians. The same goes for Eurasia and Eastern Europe. Many Malayalis have Roman ancestry. Your entire argument is based this difference which I am saying is true but does not prove AIT. Look at the paintings of Egyptians they look dark and they spoke a Semetic langauage, today they look light skin and still speak a semetic language. Same goes for many North Africans and Arabs. R1a and Steppe are not the same thing. As for the divison of North Indians and South Indians, these are artifically created by European scholars by using linqustics. In reality Southern India is South of the Vindyas. Its a geographical division. There were no two divisions of India in any of our traditional texts besides the divions of Brahmins in the 12th century. So go and study Indian history properly before making any videos. You're a Dravidianist, you're not neautral in your analysis

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's wait for the deciphering of Indus script before concluding anything

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anglo Indians are not majority, plus afgans are Indo-Iranians themselves, also u didn't mentioning dravidians. First wave of humans in India, are humans from Africa, but they migrated during ice age, so they entered through Arabia, rather than going all the way the through Iran, these early people also went to Malay archipelago

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also Austro Asiatic languages and Dravidian languages are different family. So that means Indus valley language is not Dravidian.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

taxila was built before birth of god buddha, buddha opposed caste system, life style of people in kaliyugh, he also loved the life sanatana darma, he also believed in karma moksha etc. he taught people to get enlighten by meditation, same as sage of sanatana darma. every religions were allowed to come nalanda and taxila, later university become very popular among buddists during ashoka period, thats how sanatana darma gave equal importants to all. buddha is inspiration to me 💓💓

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

or your kind information buddhism has a caste system. Your half-baked knowledge can't even wait for the deciphering of Indus script before concluding anything. The path of Buddha was not against Vedas, nor yoga. According to #suttpitak" "tripitak" he called his disciples to follow the path of Noble people that is Arya od society.

Specialist team is
asktokbt@gmail.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Come on friend we all know history is written by winners to keep themself safe and glorified. And when the writers are so naive that they give malaria-infected blankets to the Native to kill them, we can't expect humanity, truth, and transparency. Pieces of evidence are plentiful to prove that English rulers have lied, why can't we recheck our own history. It's insane and unscientific. Chill we are not always wrong, please end your confusion and decolonize a little bit. This all AIT was spread by the missionary, imperialists, colonist and facists to legitimise their loot and belittle the freedom struggle of gloriuous Indian Civilization. English fakers have constructed reasons and grounds of previous two world wars and they want to create another one with their woke, racist, facist, and greedy motivations. They just want to divert the people from working towards a common goal. We Indians have much in common than difference so they are doing mischiefe by Supplanting Old issues which has lowest importance in todays time. Why people who glorify themselves with Arya Acncestary are considered enemy of Dravids. Indeed we are same, I live south to Vindhyas then I am also Travidhshishu or Dravida. What will we do if Dravids could prove with all facts that Aryavart is our common identity.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stop colonial scavenging. There were only few skeletons were found less than 37 in IVC. How can you keep it as pointer. May be due to change of river course etc. people left the area. There are more proofs of migrations due to natural devastations and calamities than Aryans going there and killing natives. Why don't we find any further activities in those place, after movement of Indus valley people, like we have in Pakistan after killing lakhs of people they established their own society. It's meaningless to talk to you about it, unless you unbound your arguments from racist ideology inculcated by colonial masters. We don't want country without either of us even if one of us strongly believe that Arya are different than Travid.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://e-aba.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/0107KJPA/kjpa-28-1.pdf

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not an OIT theory supporter but there are many problems with current Aryan dravidian discourse, let me only point to the problems rather than supporting either side of this divide -

Firstly all Indians have major Harappan component {Andmanese & Iranian farmer mix that separated some 12000 yrs back} even among communities which show high Steppe component like ROR, Jat, Brahmins & Bhumihars.

https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(18)30398-7 - ROR & Jats closer affinity to the ancient steppe gene proving paper.

Actually there were 2 migration within close proximity {1000 yrs. difference} which forms the North South divide -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iImTC-1VWY - Tony Joseph at around 17 minute mark presents all 4 major migrations into India.

Then another interesting thing to note that people with major ASI {Ancestral South Indian} component are north Indians like Gujratis, so why their features match North Indians even though they have closer genetic affinity to tribals & South Indians ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMQiR7IHzaM - 'Masaman' keeps providing new videos regarding genetic studies as more & more new research comes out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are mixing race, complexion, facial features, linguistics etc. with Genetic studies. You need to understand the differences & methods each of these fields to even compare their results with each other.

I can provide you many proofs of Caste system from world it may not have been in written form but feature by feature there is not a single differentiating factor which makes caste system exclusively Indian, just for e.g. Ashkenazi Jews have similar endogamy patterns like some castes in India or differentiating behavior {aka discrimination} based upon class.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQcN5DtMT-0 - UNICEF social experiment

Untouchable communities - Roma or Romanis - Europe, Burakumin - Japan etc.

Regarding Inequality -

https://qz.com/694340/the-richest-families-in-florence-in-1427-are-still-the-richest-families-in-florence/

https://scroll.in/article/941364/inequality-has-become-so-embedded-in-britain-that-it-can-be-seen-in-peoples-dna

I hope you get the gist there is no single factor of caste system that can be applied to pan India & if we look beyond caste to all the various features embedded in the term 'Caste' they are all present all over the world in almost all societies in different forms with different names.

https://www.epw.in/engage/article/how-has-idea-backwardness-taken-shape

Note - Shifting of categories from education & finance to religious identities and how Caste politics actually started in India.

Let's wait for the deciphering of Indus script before concluding anything

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aryan Picnic, Tourism Theory by Western Superemacists debunked by Abhijit Chavada

Aryan Invasion Theory Debunked | Abhijit Chavda (Researcher Scientist), Dr Shiv Shastry (wrote book named Tearing down the Aryan Invasion Myth) and Sanjay Dixit (Retired IAS)

The Complete Linguistic Case for The OUT-OF-INDIA Theory (Part 1)

The Out of India Theory- Part 1 Chronology of the Rigveda

The Aryan Invasion Theory- Part II Textual Evidence and Archaeology

Precious Collection

Search This Blog

भारत के श्रेष्ठ लोग और उन के बारे में भ्रांतियां

Comments